While our principal focus is on youth baseball bat evaluations and reviews, it’s equally important that we provide a clear and concise breakdown of the USA BAT Standard. By highlighting the standard’s major points and introducing an unbiased on the full financial impact, we hope to assist the affected families adapt as quickly as possible.
5 KEY IMPACTS YOUTH BASEBALL FAMILIES SHOULD PREPARE FOR IN 2018
Any bat you own of a 2017 version and elderly will become ineligible.
By implementing a new bat performance standard, this consequently makes all bats of a 2017 model and elderly illegal. Under no circumstances will USA Baseball allow these bats to be used for matches or even practices.
Every USA Baseball publication that discusses the new standard repeatedly cites the importance of upholding the “long term integrity of this game.” Judging from this announcement, it is safe to presume that all 2018 youth baseball bats will create less power when compared to older bat versions. Bats that produce “wood-like degree” swings won’t deliver the level of soda found in aluminum and composite bats from years ago.
The USABAT Standard will not incorporate a drop-weight limitation.
Unlike the BBCOR which limits to a baseball bat length/weight ratio to fall -3, the USABAT Standard won’t have a limit. This gives players of all statures and dimensions the liberty to swing any size bat only so long as the bat displays the USABAT Stamp.
Youth baseball bat barrel sizes will arrive in two choices- two 1/4 barrel or 2 5/8 barrel.
USA Baseball now allows 2 5/8 barrel bats. These barrel sizes will be the only two available for players.
The USABAT Standard Won’t impact the Senior Division of Little League.
USA Baseball today will allow 2 5/8 barrel bats. These barrel sizes will be the only two accessible for gamers.
As mentioned before, USA Baseball’s #1 reason for changing the bat performance standard would be to conserve “the long-term integrity of the game”. In accordance with USA Baseball, recent technological improvements have emerged which allow manufactures to create non-wood bats that perform at wood-like levels. By using these this of bat, the number of high scoring childhood baseball matches will decrease. Needless to say, there will always be games that feature a whole lot of runs but the consistency of witnessing these high scoring games will diminish. The new standard reduces the trampoline effect on the baseball more than the old conventional thereby decreasing the amount of pop youth gamers are accustom to generating. By utilizing the USABAT Standard, USA Baseball considers they’ve taken a significant step towards bringing back sensible offensive statistics back which have vanished during the recent composite bat era.
Bear in mind, the vast majority of youth baseball players take part in one of these organizations below.
– Little League
– Cal Ripken/Babe Ruth
Implementing the USABAT Standard on a universal platform allows youth baseball families to switch leagues without the stress of adapting to another bat performance standard. As long as your child plays for a one of those USA Baseball affiliates listed above, the USABAT standard will constantly apply to you.
1. THE SUCCESS OF THE BBCOR (BATTED BALL COEFFICIENT OF RESTITUTION)
In 2015, a Wall Street Journal article cited a study conducted by the National Sporting Goods Association regarding childhood baseball fall outs. They discovered that 8.8 million children played organized baseball in the calendar year 2000 versus 5.3 million in 2013. The point we are trying to make is that: In a time when the demand for youth baseball gear is reduced, the USABAT Standard will indirectly provide a significant surge in baseball bat sales.
Among our core objectives is to provide a unique and unbiased perspective on most of the aspects associated with the USABAT Standard including the business side. Having said that, it’s impossible to ignore the inevitable earnings spikes which will impact the youth baseball bat market. Please note, we are not implying that USA Baseball implemented this new standard to drive bat earnings, however how do we ignore the enormous increase in gains that comes from forcing every single youth baseball player throughout the nation to obtain a completely new bat all at once?
In the last few decades, many studies have documented significant reductions in the involvement of youth organized sports. According to an yearly study performed by the Sports & Fitness Industry Association, a 9% decline occurred in the US from 2010-2015. Regrettably, 3% of that came from the game of baseball. The same study revealed that among the 5.54 million childhood baseball players in 2007 ranging from ages 6-12, 1.2 million have dropped over an 8 year span as 4.34 million enrolled in 2015.
Within 8 decades, youth baseball has seen a 21.6% decline in participants. Hypothetically speaking, let’s say youth baseball organizations hopes to obtain an average of $200 per participant from enrollment fees, fund raising revenue, and group sponsorships. By losing 1.2 million participants, youth baseball has incurred a revenue loss of about $240 million bucks within a little 8 year window.
In actuality, you would believe the decrease in injuries would be the top reason why USA Baseball made the change right? Well really, they firmly say that accidents WERE NOT A element in the decision to adopt the USABAT Standard.
We understand the logic behind their response however, the fact that childhood baseball will undergo a decrease in bat related injuries is something which needs to be praised and discussed further rather than swept under the rug. Using bats that limit power will slow down the speed on the baseball which theoretically makes the sport safer overall to some level. Positive expectations like this shouldn’t be purposefully ignored but it’s easy to know why. If USA Baseball admits that accidents are predicted to decrease, that may make it look like childhood baseball has an injury “problem” in need of mending. From a company perspective, negative words like “harm” doesn’t help generating revenue. The last thing any youth sports business needs is their new being connected to a debatable injury situation.
2. A FINANCIAL BOOST IN A DECLINING MARKET
One of our core goals is to offer a unique and unbiased perspective on all the facets associated with the USABAT Standard such as the business side. Having said that, it is impossible to ignore the inevitable earnings spikes which will impact the youth baseball bat marketplace. Please note, we are not suggesting that USA Baseball implemented this new standard to induce bat sales, however how can we ignore the enormous increase in profits that comes from forcing each and every youth baseball player across the country to purchase a brand new bat all at one time?
In the last few decades, a number of studies have documented significant decreases in the participation of youth organized sports. According to an annual study performed by the Sports & Fitness Industry Association, a 9% decline occurred in the US from 2010-2015. Regrettably, 3% of which came from the game of baseball. This same study showed that among the 5.54 million childhood baseball participants in 2007 ranging from ages 6-12, 1.2 million have fell over an 8 year period as 4.34 million registered in 2015.
Within 8 decades, childhood baseball has witnessed a 21.6% reduction in participants. Hypothetically speaking, let’s say youth baseball organizations hopes to receive an average of $200 per participant from enrollment fees, fund raising revenue, and team sponsorships. By losing 1.2 million participants, youth baseball has incurred a revenue loss of approximately $240 million dollars within a little 8 year window.
They discovered that 8.8 million kids played organized baseball in the year 2000 versus 5.3 million in 2013. The point we are trying to make is this: At this time once the requirement for youth baseball equipment is low, the USABAT Standard will indirectly offer a significant spike in baseball bat sales.
For the very first time in several decades, each and every youth baseball participant will be swinging a completely new bat in 2018. Every childhood dugout in the united states is going to be lined with only 2018 model youth bats. USA Baseball has repeatedly stated that the USABAT Standard is for the betterment of the sport because it will uphold the “long term integrity of the game” with injuries and financial profits not playing a part in the choice. This could be true, however we can not dismiss the obvious financial gain associated with implementing a new standard. What if tomorrow, the US government decides to implement a law that only 2018 model vehicle are permitted to be driven starting 1/1/2018? What if the rationale behind the law was to uphold the “long term integrity of our environment”? This hypothetical scenario may be somewhat extravagant, but it will put into perspective the economic impact directly caused by USA Baseball implementing the USABAT Standard.